Chess Tempo

Username:
Password:
/ Register

User Details

Username:
Blitz Rating:
Standard Rating:
Logout
January 09, 2009, 03:04:29 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: problem 34976  (Read 382 times)
argentum
Newbie
*
Posts: 34


View Profile
« on: July 29, 2008, 08:12:18 pm »

Hi,

Do you think 1. exd4 should be approved ? it is a good idea forking queen and bishop next move.

That kind of move is easy to find for human as attacker of queen is removed and no need to make queen desperado move. the evaluation is still clearly winning and maybe -1 less than the best move.

As you are developing the site you could have a sort of exception list of problems where you could override computer evaluation. then you would collect a database of computer generated problems and additionally human approved exceptions to make to problem base as good as possible. 

regs,
argentum

Logged
slacker00
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2008, 11:46:45 pm »

1. exN QxR 2.dxe5 Bxe5  I guess white gets 2 pieces for the rook.  It's much better to get a whole piece for nothing.
Logged
richard
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1090



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2008, 01:02:16 am »

Hi argentum,

I do plan to add the capability to accept human suggested alternatives at some point.  At the moment the idea is to allow users to enter (on a board) their idea of a better line and then have users vote on suggested lines.  If enough users vote for an alternative then the alternative would become the new "main" line. This is still a while off though.

Regards,
Richard.


Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to: